CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 83% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

CoreWeave and Oracle Shares Sell Off: Are AI Infrastructure Debt Risks Rising?

Source Tradingkey

TradingKey - In October 2026, some AI infrastructure-related stocks and bonds came under pressure, with shares of CoreWeave (CRWV) and Oracle (ORCL) facing a sell-off.

As of the close on October 21, CoreWeave was down about 30.2% from its October 1 closing price, while Oracle fell by approximately 6.5% over the same period. The market has begun to reassess the financing risks of high-capital-expenditure models.

The risk structures of the two companies differ: CoreWeave faces relatively direct financing pressure, while Oracle needs to cope with cash flow pressure brought by AI investments.

In addition, Meta (META) reported third-quarter revenue up 26% year-over-year to $64.6 billion, but its capital expenditures of $34.91 billion exceeded operating cash flow of $32.79 billion, resulting in negative free cash flow of $2.12 billion. As of the end of September, the company still held $82.45 billion in cash and marketable securities, maintaining a relatively ample liquidity buffer.

This indicates that even with mature advertising businesses and large cash reserves, tech giants may face periodic cash flow pressures as they ramp up AI infrastructure investments.

CoreWeave vs. Oracle Debt Comparison

The following data is as of June 30, 2026 for CoreWeave and August 31, 2026 for Oracle, reflecting different reporting dates.

Debt and Financing Metrics

CoreWeave

Oracle

Debt Principal / Total Borrowings

$35.551 billion

$125.337 billion

Recognized Operating Lease Liabilities

$16.319 billion

$34.621 billion

Recognized Finance Lease Liabilities

$221 million

$9.185 billion

Uncommenced Lease Commitments

Approximately $35.5 billion, with an additional portion currently uncertain

Approximately $288 billion

Primary Investment Uses

GPUs, servers, and data center infrastructure

Cloud infrastructure, AI data centers, and related equipment

S&P Long-Term Issuer Rating

B+, Positive Outlook

BBB-, Stable Outlook

Among these, CoreWeave's approximately $35.5 billion represents estimated future undiscounted lease payments, while Oracle's approximately $288 billion represents additional lease commitments; neither should be directly included in current debt principal.

The S&P ratings highlight differing risk profiles for the two companies. CoreWeave's senior unsecured bonds are partially rated B, placing them in speculative grade, while Oracle's long-term issuer rating stands at BBB-, remaining within investment grade but approaching the speculative-grade threshold.

This implies that CoreWeave is more sensitive to changes in financing conditions, whereas Oracle needs to demonstrate that its large-scale AI investments will not continuously erode its financial flexibility.

CoreWeave: Rapid Revenue Growth, Financing Pressures Remain

CoreWeave builds data centers through debt, leasing, and GPU-related financing, and then provides AI compute to customers. This model benefits from growing demand for compute capacity, but it also carries high interest, depreciation, and lease costs.

In the second quarter of 2026, CoreWeave's revenue increased by 112% year-over-year to $2.575 billion, with a net loss of $626 million and net interest expense reaching $640 million. In mid-October, yields on some of the company's bonds briefly surpassed 15%, reflecting increased investor caution over its financing risks.

Rising bond yields do not mean the company has defaulted, but they could drive up subsequent financing costs. If data center deliveries are delayed, customer demand falls short of expectations, or cash flow fails to cover interest and ongoing investments, CoreWeave's financial pressure could intensify further.

Oracle: Cloud Business Grows, Cash Flow Under Pressure

Oracle's cloud infrastructure business is growing rapidly, but expanding data center investments are putting pressure on free cash flow.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2027, Oracle's revenue increased 30% year-over-year to $19.3 billion, and cloud infrastructure revenue grew 121% to approximately $7.4 billion. During the same period, operating cash flow was approximately $23 billion, while free cash flow was negative $5 billion.

In July 2026, S&P downgraded Oracle's long-term credit rating from BBB to BBB-, which remains the lowest tier of investment grade.

Going forward, key focus areas include data center commissioning, customer contract fulfillment, and cash collection. If revenue growth fails to consistently cover capital expenditures, Oracle's free cash flow and financing flexibility may come under further pressure.

Are AI Infrastructure Debt Risks Rising?

On October 14, higher-than-expected U.S. September CPI data fueled rate hike expectations, weighing on AI infrastructure stocks. That day, Oracle fell 7.3% and CoreWeave dropped 15%, reflecting investor concerns over financing pressure and investment returns under high interest rates.

For companies with high debt loads and ongoing investments in data centers and AI computing power, if interest rates stay elevated for an extended period, the costs of new borrowings and refinancing maturing debt may rise, thereby increasing interest expenses and cash flow pressure.

A Reuters poll on October 20 showed that 94 of 100 surveyed economists expect the Federal Reserve to hold interest rates steady at 3.75%–4.00% at its October 27–28 meeting, with all respondents expecting the Fed to raise rates in December.

As of press time, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield was around 5.12%. A high-yield environment could increase long-term corporate financing costs.

Currently, financing risks in the AI infrastructure sector have indeed risen, but there is insufficient evidence to suggest the broader industry has fallen into a debt crisis. Pressure on CoreWeave's stock price and certain bonds reflects heightened market caution regarding its high leverage and refinancing costs, while Oracle faces challenges from expanding AI capital expenditures, pressure on free cash flow, and credit rating downgrades.

CoreWeave and Oracle have different financial structures and debt-servicing capabilities, and face distinct risks. Going forward, attention should be paid to shifts in bond yields, CDS spreads, and credit ratings to assess whether operating cash flow can cover interest, lease payments, and capital expenditures, while tracking data center commissioning progress and return on investment.

If financing costs continue to rise while revenue and cash flow fail to keep pace, refinancing risks for some AI infrastructure companies may intensify further. Conversely, if demand for computing power remains strong, projects are commissioned on schedule, and cash flow improves, financing risks are expected to ease.

Disclaimer: The content available on Mitrade Insights is provided for informational and marketing purposes only. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research
Nothing in this material constitutes investment advice, personal recommendation, investment research, an offer, or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. The content has been prepared without consideration of your individual investment objectives, financial situation, or needs, and should not be treated as such.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance and/or results. Forward-looking scenarios or forecasts are not a guarantee of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated.
Mitrade makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided and accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on such information.
placeholder
Financial Markets 2026: Volatility Catalysts in Gold, Silver, Oil, and Blue-Chip Stocks—A CFD Trader's OutlookThe financial world is perpetually in motion, but the landscape for 2026 seems to be shaping up to be particularly dynamic. For CFD traders navigating global markets, this heightened volatility could present a distinctive set of challenges and opportunities.
Author  Rachel Weiss
13 hours ago
The financial world is perpetually in motion, but the landscape for 2026 seems to be shaping up to be particularly dynamic. For CFD traders navigating global markets, this heightened volatility could present a distinctive set of challenges and opportunities.
placeholder
The Trumponomics Ebook: Oil Price Volatility in the Iran War Understand how the Strait of Hormuz shock moved markets, and what CFD traders watched next.
Author  Rachel Weiss
Oct 21, Wed
Understand how the Strait of Hormuz shock moved markets, and what CFD traders watched next.
placeholder
Ripple and Stellar outlook: XRP ETF demand strengthens, XLM RWA market hits $4 billion milestoneRipple (XRP) and Stellar (XLM) are showing signs of recovery on Tuesday after rebounding slightly the previous day, following double-digit corrections last week.
Author  FXStreet
Sep 01, Tue
Ripple (XRP) and Stellar (XLM) are showing signs of recovery on Tuesday after rebounding slightly the previous day, following double-digit corrections last week.
placeholder
WTI Price Forecast: Climbs above $86.00 as 100-day SMA breakout comes into playWest Texas Intermediate (WTI) – the benchmark US Crude Oil price – attracts buyers for the second straight day on Tuesday as escalating US-Iran tensions and the standoff over the Strait of Hormuz continue to fuel supply concerns.
Author  FXStreet
Sep 01, Tue
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) – the benchmark US Crude Oil price – attracts buyers for the second straight day on Tuesday as escalating US-Iran tensions and the standoff over the Strait of Hormuz continue to fuel supply concerns.
placeholder
Gold steadies below $4,350 as surging yields offset support from Fed rate-hold betsGold price (XAU/USD) holds steady near $4,335 after pulling back from an early-June top near $4,450 during the early Asian trading hours on Wednesday.
Author  FXStreet
Aug 19, Wed
Gold price (XAU/USD) holds steady near $4,335 after pulling back from an early-June top near $4,450 during the early Asian trading hours on Wednesday.
goTop
quote